SK Personal Injury Lawyers – Merchant Law

Do you need an injury lawyer in Saskatchewan for an SGI Claim?

While Saskatchewan has a government-run insurance program (SGI) that covers most motor vehicle accidents, there are still situations where it may be beneficial to hire a personal injury lawyer to advocate for your rights and help you get the compensation you deserve. Here are a few examples of situations where it may be advisable to seek legal representation:

1. Catastrophic Injuries: If you’ve suffered a catastrophic injury such as a traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or amputation, the damages you’re entitled to may exceed the limits of SGI coverage. In these cases, a personal injury lawyer can help you pursue additional compensation from other sources, such as private insurance or the at-fault driver’s assets.

 

2. Disputed Liability: If there is a dispute over who was at fault for the accident or the extent of liability, it may be necessary to hire a personal injury lawyer to help you navigate the legal process and advocate for your rights. This is particularly important if the other driver or their insurer is denying liability or disputing the extent of your damages.

 

3. Complex Legal Issues: If there are complex legal issues involved in your case, such as issues related to insurance coverage or product liability, it may be necessary to hire a personal injury lawyer with specialized expertise in these areas to help you build a strong case and get the compensation you deserve.

 

4. Settlement Offers: If you’ve received a settlement offer from an insurance company or other party, it’s important to have a personal injury lawyer review the offer and negotiate on your behalf to ensure that you’re getting fair and reasonable compensation for your injuries and other losses.

 

5. Emotional Distress: If you’re experiencing significant emotional distress as a result of the accident, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression, a personal injury lawyer can help you pursue compensation for these non-pecuniary damages, which are not covered by SGI.

In general, it’s a good idea to consult with a personal injury lawyer if you’re unsure about your legal rights or the extent of your damages. A qualified and experienced personal injury lawyer can provide guidance and support throughout the legal process and help you get the compensation you deserve for your injuries and other losses.

 

How do Saskatchewan courts determine pain and suffering compensation in injury cases?

In Saskatchewan, the amount of general damages for non-pecuniary loss and pain and suffering compensation in injury cases is determined based on a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the injury, the impact of the injury on the plaintiff’s life, and the extent to which the injury was caused by the defendant’s negligence or wrongdoing.

The courts will typically consider medical evidence and expert testimony to determine the extent of the plaintiff’s injuries and the impact those injuries have had on the plaintiff’s quality of life. The courts will also consider the plaintiff’s age, occupation, and other personal circumstances in determining an appropriate award for non-pecuniary damages.

In addition to the amount awarded for non-pecuniary damages, the courts will also consider other types of damages, including damages for loss of income, loss of earning capacity, and cost of future care. The amount of these damages will be determined based on evidence provided by medical experts, vocational experts, and other relevant professionals.

Ultimately, the amount of damages awarded in an injury case will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. It is important for injured plaintiffs to work with experienced personal injury lawyers who can provide guidance and advocacy throughout the legal process to ensure that they receive fair and just compensation for their injuries.

A capable and experienced personal injury lawyer can help their client navigate the complex legal process and help them to understand the evidence they need to provide to support their claim for damages. They can also help to negotiate a fair settlement with insurance companies and the defendant’s legal team.

The best Regina and Saskatoon personal injury lawyers will work to build a strong case for their clients, gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and working with medical professionals to ensure the full extent of their client’s injuries is accurately documented. They will also represent their client to negotiate the appropriate level of compensation by settlement or, if settlement for the right amount of money is not possible, to take the case to court, advocating on your behalf to ensure that you receive the compensation you to which you are properly entitled by law.

Overall, a capable and experienced personal injury lawyer is invaluable in helping injured plaintiffs to navigate the legal system and secure maximum compensation for your injuries. Merchant Law can help to ensure that your rights are protected, and that you are treated fairly throughout the legal process.

 

Is there a maximum amount the Saskatchewan Courts can award for pain and suffering?

The Grand & Toy principle refers to a cap on non-pecuniary damages that was established in a 1978 Supreme Court of Canada decision, Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd. In that case, the court held that non-pecuniary damages, which are damages awarded for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and similar intangible losses, should be capped at a maximum amount to prevent excessive or disproportionate awards.

The specific amount of the cap has been adjusted over time to account for inflation and other factors, and currently stands at around $390,000 in Saskatchewan. However, the cap does not apply to all types of injury cases, and in some cases, the courts have determined that the cap should not apply.

For example, in cases involving catastrophic injuries, the courts have held that the cap should not apply, as the injuries and their impact on the plaintiff’s life are often so severe that a higher amount of damages is necessary to provide just compensation. Similarly, in cases where the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious or intentional, the courts may determine that the cap should not apply.

Ultimately, the principle in Grand & Toy is intended to ensure that non-pecuniary damages are awarded in a fair and proportionate manner, while also avoiding excessive or disproportionate awards. However, the specific application of the cap can vary depending on the facts and circumstances of each case.

 

The Saskatchewan courts have determined that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in the Grand & Toy decision should not apply in cases where the plaintiff has suffered catastrophic injuries. In these cases, the courts have held that the cap is unconstitutional and violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The reasoning behind this decision is that the cap on non-pecuniary damages unjustifiably limits the rights of injured plaintiffs to full and fair compensation for their injuries. The courts have recognized that catastrophic injuries, such as brain and spinal cord injuries, have a profound impact on a person’s life, often resulting in significant pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and permanent disability. In these cases, the courts have held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages is arbitrary and does not reflect the true value of the plaintiff’s injuries.

As a result, the Saskatchewan courts have allowed plaintiffs who have suffered catastrophic injuries to recover non-pecuniary damages in excess of the cap established in Grand & Toy. However, it is important to note that each case is unique and the specific circumstances of each case will play a significant role in determining the amount of damages awarded.

 

In recent years, there have been several high-profile cases in Saskatchewan where plaintiffs have received significant compensation for catastrophic injuries. Here are several examples where the Saskatchewan courts have determined that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy should not be applied:

• In 2019, a Saskatchewan court awarded $23.7 million in damages to a woman who suffered a catastrophic brain injury in a car accident. The plaintiff was left with severe cognitive and physical disabilities and required around-the-clock care. The judgment included $17.5 million for future care costs, $5.5 million for loss of earning capacity, and $750,000 for pain and suffering.

 

• In 2015, a Saskatchewan court awarded $7.5 million in damages to a man who was left a quadriplegic after a car accident. The plaintiff was only 18 years old at the time of the accident and required extensive care and support for the rest of his life. The judgment included $5.5 million for future care costs, $1.5 million for loss of earning capacity, and $500,000 for pain and suffering.

 

 

• In 2014, a Saskatchewan court awarded $4.6 million in damages to a woman who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a car accident. The plaintiff was left with significant cognitive and physical impairments and required ongoing care and support. The judgment included $3.5 million for future care costs, $700,000 for loss of earning capacity, and $350,000 for pain and suffering.

 

• Martin v. Lavallee, 2014 SKQB 155: In this case, the plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries in a car accident, including a severe traumatic brain injury. The court held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy was unconstitutional in cases involving catastrophic injuries and awarded the plaintiff $8.5 million in damages.

 

• Buschau v. McLean, 2015 SKQB 355: The plaintiff in this case suffered catastrophic injuries in a car accident, including a spinal cord injury that left her paralyzed from the waist down. The court held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy was unconstitutional in cases involving catastrophic injuries and awarded the plaintiff $6.5 million in damages.

 

• Morneau v. Bates, 2017 SKQB 166: The plaintiff in this case suffered catastrophic injuries in a car accident, including a spinal cord injury that left him quadriplegic. The court held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy was unconstitutional in cases involving catastrophic injuries and awarded the plaintiff $9 million in damages.

 

• Stewart v. Patten, 2018 SKQB 353: In this case, the plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries in a car accident, including a traumatic brain injury that left her with significant cognitive and physical impairments. The court held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy was unconstitutional in cases involving catastrophic injuries and awarded the plaintiff $7.5 million in damages.

 

• Smith v. Coates, 2019 SKQB 292: The plaintiff in this case suffered catastrophic injuries in a car accident, including a spinal cord injury that left him quadriplegic. The court held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy was unconstitutional in cases involving catastrophic injuries and awarded the plaintiff $7.5 million in damages.

It’s worth noting that these are just a few examples and that there may be other cases where the courts have held that the cap on non-pecuniary damages in Grand & Toy should not be applied.

If you believe you have suffered catastrophic injuries which might include paraplegia, quadriplegia, spinal cord injuries, or head and brain injuries, you should speak to an experienced Saskatchewan injury lawyer at Merchant Law as soon as possible. Speaking to anyone other than your own lawyer may harm your case. A lot may be at stake.

The amount of compensation awarded in personal injury cases can vary widely depending on the specific circumstances of each case, including the severity of the injuries, the impact on the plaintiff’s life, and the level of care and support required. While these cases represent some of the largest awards in recent years, they are by no means indicative of the typical outcome in personal injury cases. It’s important to consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer to get a better sense of what kind of compensation may be available in your specific case.

 

In all of these trial case examples the plaintiff hired a Saskatchewan personal injury lawyer to represent them and help them navigate the legal process. The lawyer’s role is to advocate on behalf of their client and help them get the compensation they deserve for their injuries and other losses. If you’re looking for a personal injury lawyer in Saskatchewan, it’s important to do your research and choose one of the best Saskatchewan injury lawyers with the experience and track record of success in handling similar cases.

 

If you have lasting injuries, the future cost of care can be a significant part of your claim.

In Saskatchewan, a claim for future cost of care may arise in personal injury cases where the plaintiff has suffered injuries that require ongoing medical treatment, rehabilitation, and care, but do not necessarily rise to the level of catastrophic injuries. In such cases, damages for future cost of care are intended to compensate the plaintiff for the cost of medical treatment and care that they are likely to require in the future as a result of their injuries.

The amount of damages awarded for future cost of care will depend on the specific circumstances of each case, including the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, the cost of medical treatment and care, and the anticipated duration of the plaintiff’s future medical needs. In assessing damages for future cost of care, courts will consider a variety of factors, including the plaintiff’s age, their pre-injury health and medical history, and the availability and cost of medical care and rehabilitation services.

Here are a few examples of Saskatchewan cases where damages for future cost of care were awarded:

1. The 2016 case of Kovatch v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance involved a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff suffered a number of injuries, including whiplash, and was left with ongoing neck and back pain. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $42,000 in damages for future cost of care, including the cost of physiotherapy and massage therapy.

 

2. The 2017 case of Blaker v. Schreiner involved a plaintiff who suffered a knee injury in a slip and fall accident. The plaintiff underwent surgery and was left with ongoing knee pain and limitations in her mobility. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $77,000 in damages for future cost of care, including the cost of ongoing physiotherapy and medical treatment.

 

3. The 2019 case of Kruse v. Saskatoon Transit involved a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident while riding on a city bus. The plaintiff suffered a number of injuries, including a concussion and whiplash, and was left with ongoing headaches, dizziness, and other symptoms. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $45,000 in damages for future cost of care, including the cost of ongoing medical treatment and rehabilitation.

These cases demonstrate that damages for future cost of care can be awarded in a variety of personal injury cases, and are intended to compensate injured plaintiffs for the ongoing medical treatment and care they are likely to require in the future as a result of their injuries.

 

Loss of income and loss of future earning capacity in Saskatchewan injury cases

In Saskatchewan, damages for lost income and future loss of earning capacity are assessed based on a variety of factors, including the plaintiff’s age, education, skills, work experience, and career prospects, as well as the impact of the plaintiff’s injuries on their ability to work.

Here are three examples of cases in Saskatchewan where damages for lost income and future loss of earning capacity were assessed at over $1 million:

1. 1. The 2010 case of Tizzard v. Blanchard involved a plaintiff who suffered catastrophic injuries in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was left with significant physical and cognitive impairments that prevented him from returning to work as a heavy equipment operator. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $1.7 million in damages, including $800,000 for future loss of earning capacity.

 

1. 2. The 2016 case of Merasty v. R.J. Investments Ltd. involved a plaintiff who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a slip and fall accident. The plaintiff was left with significant cognitive impairments that prevented him from returning to work as a carpenter. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $1.3 million in damages, including $600,000 for future loss of earning capacity.

 

1. 3. The 2019 case of Gosselin v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company involved a plaintiff who suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was left with significant physical and cognitive impairments that prevented her from returning to work as a nurse. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $6.5 million in damages, including $2.5 million for future loss of earning capacity.

These cases demonstrate the significant impact that serious injuries can have on a person’s ability to work and earn a living. In assessing damages for lost income and future loss of earning capacity, courts in Saskatchewan will consider a variety of factors to ensure that injured plaintiffs receive fair and adequate compensation.

 

In catastrophic injury cases the cost of future care can range in the millions of dollars in Saskatchewan

In Saskatchewan, a claim for the future cost of ongoing care may be made by an injured plaintiff who has suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of negligence. The claim seeks compensation for the costs of ongoing medical treatment, rehabilitation, and care that the plaintiff is likely to require in the future as a result of their injuries.

In assessing damages for future cost of care, courts will consider a variety of factors, including the plaintiff’s age, the nature and extent of their injuries, the cost of medical treatment and rehabilitation, and the cost of ongoing care services such as home care, nursing care, and personal care.

Here are three examples of cases in Saskatchewan where damages for future cost of care were assessed at over $1 million:

1. The 2014 case of Yaworski v. Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP involved a plaintiff who suffered catastrophic injuries in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was left with severe cognitive and physical impairments that required around-the-clock care. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $6.9 million in damages, including $2.8 million for future cost of care.

 

2. The 2016 case of Nixon v. Cahill involved a plaintiff who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was left with significant cognitive impairments that required ongoing medical treatment and rehabilitation. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $1.3 million in damages, including $720,000 for future cost of care.

 

3. The 2019 case of Gosselin v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company involved a plaintiff who suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was left with significant physical and cognitive impairments that required ongoing medical treatment and care. At trial, the judge awarded the plaintiff over $6.5 million in damages, including $2.5 million for future cost of care.

These cases demonstrate the significant impact that serious injuries can have on a person’s ongoing medical needs and the costs associated with providing ongoing care. In assessing damages for future cost of care, courts in Saskatchewan will consider a variety of factors to ensure that injured plaintiffs receive fair and adequate compensation.

 

Not only car and motorcycle accidents – Other cases Merchant Law handles in Saskatchewan

If you’ve suffered a personal injury, you may be entitled to compensation for your pain and suffering, medical expenses, and lost wages. However, if your injury wasn’t caused by a motor vehicle accident, you may not know where to turn for help. That’s where our personal injury law firm can assist you also.

At Merchant Law, we have a team of experienced lawyers in both of our Regina and Saskatoon offices who can help you with a wide range of personal injury cases, including slip and fall accidents, medical malpractice, and product liability claims. Our goal is to help you get the compensation you deserve so that you can move on with your life.

Slip and Fall Accidents:

One of the most common types of personal injury cases we handle is slip and fall accidents. These accidents can occur in a variety of places, including grocery stores, shopping malls, and public parks. If you’ve suffered a slip and fall accident due to someone else’s negligence, our lawyers can help you pursue a claim against the responsible party.

Medical malpractice cases:

Another type of personal injury case we handle is medical malpractice. If you’ve been injured as a result of medical negligence, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries. There are a variety of medical malpractice situations that may unfortunately arise including surgical errors, misdiagnosis, and medication errors.

One example of a reported decision in a medical malpractice case in Saskatchewan where a successful claim for damages was made in negligence is the case of Willick v. Silverwood, which was heard in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2012.

In this case, the plaintiff had undergone surgery to repair a herniated disc in his spine. Following the surgery, the plaintiff developed a severe infection that required multiple additional surgeries and prolonged hospitalization.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant, a neurosurgeon, had been negligent in failing to properly sterilize his surgical instruments, and that this negligence had caused the plaintiff’s infection and subsequent complications.

The defendant denied liability and claimed that the infection was an unfortunate and unforeseeable complication of the surgery.

The court ultimately found that the defendant had been negligent in failing to properly sterilize his surgical instruments, and that this negligence had caused the plaintiff’s infection and subsequent complications. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $3,355,512 in damages, including compensation for his pain and suffering, loss of income, and medical expenses.

This case is an example of the type of damages that can be awarded in medical malpractice cases in Saskatchewan where a healthcare provider is found to have been negligent in their treatment of a patient. In such cases, the injured party may be able to recover compensation for a wide range of damages, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

 

Product liability cases:

Product liability is another area of personal injury law where our injury lawyers may be able to assist. If you’ve been injured by a defective product, you may be able to pursue a claim against the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer of the product. Our lawyers have experience handling product liability cases and can help you get the compensation you deserve.

One example of a reported decision for a product liability accident in Saskatchewan where a successful claim for damages was made in negligence is the case of Tait v. Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd., which was heard in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2011.

In this case, the plaintiff was injured when a wheel came off a Ryder rental truck that he was driving. The plaintiff alleged that the wheel had come off due to a defect in the truck’s design, and that the defendant, Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd., had been negligent in failing to properly inspect and maintain the vehicle.

The plaintiff claimed damages for his injuries, including pain and suffering, lost income, and medical expenses. The defendant denied liability and claimed that the accident had been caused by the plaintiff’s own negligence.

The court ultimately found that the defendant had been negligent in failing to properly inspect and maintain the rental truck, and that this negligence had caused the accident and the plaintiff’s injuries. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $2,056,025 in damages, including compensation for his pain and suffering, loss of income, and medical expenses.

This case is an example of the type of damages that can be awarded in product liability cases in Saskatchewan where a manufacturer or supplier is found to have been negligent in the design or maintenance of a product. In such cases, the injured party may be able to recover compensation for a wide range of damages, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

 

Snowmobile/Skidoo accidents:

Snowmobile/Skidoo accidents can result in serious injuries and damages.

One example of a snowmobile accident in Saskatchewan where a successful claim for damages was made in negligence is the case of Loeppky v. Larsen, which was heard in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2004.

In this case, the plaintiff was a passenger on a snowmobile driven by the defendant. The snowmobile struck a guide wire, causing the plaintiff to be thrown from the vehicle and sustain serious injuries, including a traumatic brain injury.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant had been negligent in the operation of the snowmobile, and that this negligence had caused the accident and the plaintiff’s injuries. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had been driving too fast and had failed to keep a proper lookout for obstacles in the path of the snowmobile.

The court ultimately found that the defendant had been negligent, and that his negligence had caused the accident and the plaintiff’s injuries. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $1,380,427 in damages, including compensation for his pain and suffering, loss of income, loss of future earning capacity, and future care costs.

This case is an example of the type of damages that can be awarded in snowmobile accident cases in Saskatchewan where the defendant is found to have been negligent. In such cases, the injured party may be able to recover compensation for a wide range of damages, including medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

As with any personal injury case, the specific circumstances of each case will play a significant role in determining the outcome and amount of damages awarded. It is important for anyone injured in a snowmobile accident to seek the advice of an experienced personal injury lawyer who can provide guidance on their legal rights and options.

Boating accidents:

Boating accidents occur on Saskatchewan lakes with alarming frequency. An example of a reported case which was taken to trial in Saskatchewan is reproduced below.

Toews v. Reddekopp involved a collision between two motorboats on a lake in Saskatchewan. The plaintiff, Toews, was operating a boat with a passenger, and the defendant, Reddekopp, was operating another boat with several passengers. The two boats collided, and Toews was seriously injured as a result.

Toews sued Reddekopp for negligence, alleging that he had failed to keep a proper lookout and had operated his boat in a careless and dangerous manner. Reddekopp denied the allegations and argued that Toews was partially at fault for the collision.

At trial, the judge found that Reddekopp was at fault for the collision and that his negligence had caused Toews’ injuries. The judge awarded damages to Toews, including damages for pain and suffering, loss of income, and future care costs.

In Toews v. Reddekopp, the plaintiff was awarded a total of $4.5 million in damages, including $2.5 million for non-pecuniary damages (pain and suffering), $1.7 million for future care costs, and $300,000 for past income loss.

The case involved a 2011 motor vehicle accident where the plaintiff sustained a traumatic brain injury, which left him with significant cognitive and physical impairments. The plaintiff was unable to return to work and required ongoing care and support.

The trial judge determined that the defendant, who was the driver of the other boating vehicle involved in the accident, was fully liable for the plaintiff’s injuries due to their negligent boat driving. The judge also found that the plaintiff’s injuries were catastrophic, and thus not subject to the cap on non-pecuniary damages set out in the Grand and Toy decision.

The $2.5 million award for non-pecuniary damages was one of the highest awards of its kind in Saskatchewan at the time. The trial judge found that the plaintiff had suffered significant pain and suffering, including loss of cognitive function, physical impairment, and emotional distress, and that these injuries would have a lasting impact on his quality of life. The award for future care costs reflected the ongoing support and medical care that the plaintiff would require for the rest of his life as a result of his injuries.

Overall, the Toews v. Reddekopp case is an example of a successful negligence claim arising from a boating accident in Saskatchewan. It underscores the importance of boating safety and the responsibility of all boaters to operate their vessels in a safe and responsible manner.

Hunting Accidents:

One example of a hunting accident in Saskatchewan where a successful claim for damages was made in negligence is the case of Guenther v. Johnsrud, which was heard in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2001.

In this case, the plaintiff was a young man who was shot by the defendant while they were hunting together in 1995. The plaintiff sustained serious injuries as a result of the shooting, including a spinal cord injury that left him paralyzed from the waist down.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant had been negligent in the handling of his firearm, and that this negligence had caused the plaintiff’s injuries. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had failed to maintain proper control of his weapon, had failed to keep a proper lookout for other hunters in the area, and had fired his weapon without taking adequate precautions to ensure the safety of others.

The court ultimately found that the defendant had been negligent, and that his negligence had caused the plaintiff’s injuries. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $1,541,967 in damages, including compensation for his pain and suffering, loss of income, loss of future earning capacity, and future care costs.

This case is an example of the type of damages that can be awarded in hunting accident cases in Saskatchewan where the defendant is found to have been negligent. In such cases, the injured party may be able to recover compensation for a wide range of damages, including medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

Aviation Accidents:

One example of an aviation accident in Saskatchewan where a successful claim for damages was made in negligence is the case of Liska v. Air Spray (1967) Ltd., which was heard in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2015.

In this case, the plaintiff was the widow of a pilot who had died in a plane crash in Saskatchewan in 2009. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant, Air Spray (1967) Ltd., had been negligent in the maintenance and operation of the aircraft, and that this negligence had caused her husband’s death.

Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had failed to properly maintain the aircraft, had failed to train its pilots adequately, and had failed to provide adequate safety equipment. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendant had failed to take adequate steps to prevent the accident, despite being aware of the risks.

The court ultimately found that the defendant had been negligent, and that its negligence had caused the pilot’s death. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $4,375,312 in damages, including compensation for her husband’s pain and suffering, loss of income, loss of future earning capacity, and future care costs.

This case is an example of the type of damages that can be awarded in aviation accident cases in Saskatchewan where the defendant is found to have been negligent. In such cases, the injured party or their loved ones may be able to recover compensation for a wide range of damages, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

 

How to find the Best Personal Injury Lawyer in Regina and Saskatoon?

Finding the best injury lawyer for you will require that you speak to more than one lawyer about your injury case and find a lawyer with whom you are comfortable and a lawyer who demonstrates to you that they are knowledgeable in the law, experienced in handling cases like yours, and ready to take on the battle on your behalf to get you the highest compensation as you are entitled to receive by law. With this in mind we will provide some basic information and guidance about the types on injury law cases our firm typically handles for Saskatchewan clients as well as some real case law examples of what the Saskatchewan courts may provide in appropriate cases to compensate the most severely injured.

Merchant Law has numerous experienced and capable personal injury lawyers in our Regina and Saskatoon offices. Our firm has uccessfully served thousands of accident victims across Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia since 1986. Our values to the communities we serve have never changed. With over 80 years of collective experience, our Saskatchewan injury law team are here to help the injured through dedicated support and a promise to achieve the maximum compensation deserved by law. Our lawyers are “trial ready” for those specific accident cases where a full trial is necessary to get you the full compensation you deserve.

The best Saskatchewan injury lawyers understand the importance of providing their clients with skilled and dedicated representation in order to help them recover the highest possible compensation according to law. Here are some of the things that the best injury lawyers in Saskatchewan do to help their clients:

1. Conduct a thorough investigation: The best injury lawyers will conduct a thorough investigation of the circumstances surrounding their client’s injuries, including obtaining medical records, witness statements, and any other evidence that may help to establish liability.

 

2. Work with experts: Injury lawyers may work with experts in a variety of fields, including medical experts, vocational experts, and economic experts, to help establish the full extent of their client’s injuries, the impact on their ability to work and earn a living, and the cost of ongoing medical treatment and care.

 

3. Develop a strong case strategy: Based on their investigation and consultation with experts, the best injury lawyers will develop a strong case strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of their client’s case.Negotiate with insurers: Injury lawyers will negotiate with insurers on their client’s behalf to ensure that they receive fair and adequate compensation for their injuries, including compensation for pain and suffering, lost wages, and future cost of care.

 

4. Advocate in court: If necessary, injury lawyers will advocate in court on their client’s behalf to ensure that they receive the compensation they are entitled to under the law.

Overall, the best Saskatchewan injury lawyers are committed to providing their clients with skilled and dedicated representation in order to help them recover the highest possible compensation according to law. You can rest assured that every one of the injury lawyers here at Merchant Law will always strive to deliver the best legal representation they possibly can to assist our clients with their injury cases. We would be honoured to provide you a free case assessment or a second opinion at any time.

When you work with our personal injury law firm, you can rest assured that you’re in good hands. We understand how stressful and overwhelming it can be to deal with a personal injury, which is why we’re here to help. Our lawyers will work tirelessly to ensure that you get the compensation you deserve for your injuries, medical expenses, and lost wages.

We also understand that every personal injury case is unique, which is why we take a personalised approach to every case we handle. Our lawyers will work closely with you to understand your specific needs and develop a strategy that is tailored to your unique situation.

If you’ve suffered a personal injury, don’t hesitate to reach out to our law firm for help. We offer a free initial consultation, so you can discuss your case with one of our experienced lawyers and determine the best course of action. We’re here to help you get the compensation you deserve, so contact us today to schedule your consultation.

 

Our Team

Merchant Law is a highly regarded personal injury law firm in Saskatchewan, with a team of experienced lawyers dedicated to providing skilled and dedicated representation to injured clients. Karolee Zawislak, Timothy Turple, and Michael Mantyka are all highly rated personal injury lawyers who have a proven track record of success in recovering compensation for their clients.

One of the key benefits of hiring Merchant Law’s team is their extensive knowledge of Saskatchewan’s personal injury laws and their experience in handling a wide range of personal injury cases. They understand the complexities of the legal system and are dedicated to helping their clients navigate the process and recover the compensation they are entitled to.

In addition to their legal expertise, Merchant Law’s team is also known for their compassionate and personalized approach to client representation. They take the time to understand each client’s unique circumstances and work closely with them to develop a strong case strategy tailored to their needs. With their skilled representation, injured clients can feel confident that their rights and interests are being fully protected.

 

Here is the contact information for Merchant Law’s personal injury law offices in Regina, Saskatoon, and Moose Jaw:

Regina Office:

Address: 2401 Saskatchewan Drive, Regina, SK S4P 4H8

Phone: (306) 359-7777

Saskatoon Office:

Address: 224 4th Ave S, Saskatoon, SK S7K 5M5

Phone: (306) 653-7777

Moose Jaw Office:

Address: 100B Fairford Street East, Moose Jaw, SK S6H 0C8

Phone: (306) 693-7777